CBCGDF Delegation attend the first meeting of Working GroupI |2024 United Nations Biodiversity Conference
Following Sunday’s ceremony, opening and regional statements marked the beginning of the official proceedings of the UN Biodiversity Conference, including the 16th meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP 16) to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), the 11th Meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CP MOP 11), and the fifth Meeting of the Parties to the Nagoya Protocol (NP MOP 5) on access and benefit-sharing (ABS). Two Working Groups met in the afternoon, to review draft decisions, and establish multiple contact and informal groups. Four contact groups met in the evening to address draft decisions on: Article 8(j) and related provisions on Indigenous Peoples and local communities (IPLCs) and traditional knowledge; digital sequence information (DSI) on genetic resources; biodiversity and health; and biodiversity mainstreaming.
The delegation from the China Biodiversity Conservation and Green Development Foundation (CBCGDF) has arrived in Colombia to attend the meeting and attended the meetings of Working GroupI.
Chair Sörqvist established contact groups on: DSI; mechanisms for planning, monitoring, reporting, and review (PMRR), to address both the GBF’s monitoring framework and the enhanced multidimensional approach to PMRR; the work programme and institutional arrangements on Article 8(j); and resource mobilization.
Chair Sörqvist suggested that delegates refrain from making substantive comments, and for deliberations to continue in the contact groups. A procedural discussion ensued with several stressing the need for consistent rules, as many agreed to present their statements in the contact groups, while some proceeded with statements in the Working Group, noting difficulties for smaller delegations’ participation in parallel groups.
Many parties noted they would present their statements in the contact group, as suggested by Chair Sörqvist. Kiribati, for the PACIFIC SIDS, stressed the need for adequate support, robust institutional arrangements, and substantive financial mechanisms for IPLCs. The DRC, for the AFRICAN GROUP, stressed that they cannot accept any revision of terminology related to IPLCs, and queried the budgetary implications of options for institutional arrangements. ZIMBABWE expressed concern that the participation of local communities in CBD processes continues to be limited.
Editor: Maggie
Checked by: Richard
Contact: v10@cbcgdf.org; +8617319454776
Do you know? We rely on crowd-funding and donations. You have the opportunity to help an international movement to advance biodiversity conservation. Donate TODAY to power up the movement to make it a better world for all life.
Donation(501C3)Paypal: intl@wbag.org
https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=2EYYJJZ8CGPLE
Comments
Post a Comment